Are we past the golden age of TV?

Ciroxa
Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

It feels like there are more shows than ever, but fewer that actually stick. Is this just nostalgia talking, or has streaming, algorithms, and binge culture changed how shows are written and remembered?

Answers

  • Promo_code_RBAAN
    Promo_code_RBAAN Posts: 783 ✭✭

    It feels like it for the most part.
    Also a lot of good shows were filmed in Canada in the past and not as many anymore are.

  • G225 code IRSGE
    G225 code IRSGE Posts: 8,821 ✭✭

    Hi, I think there are also too many TV channels and the content is diluted. Fewer channels and more money on the content would make better television.

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭
    edited December 2025

    @PotatoStarch said:
    It feels like it for the most part.
    Also a lot of good shows were filmed in Canada in the past and not as many anymore are.

    Yeah, I can see that. A lot of classic shows were filmed in Canada too, but fewer are now. Do you think it’s mainly budget and location shifts, or has the whole streaming/binge culture really changed what shows get made and remembered?

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭
    edited December 2025

    @G225 code IRSGE said:
    Hi, I think there are also too many TV channels and the content is diluted. Fewer channels and more money on the content would make better television.

    Exactly, the sheer volume makes it hard for anything to stand out. It’s like quality gets lost in the noise. I wonder if focusing budgets on fewer, stronger shows would actually make them more memorable.

  • Promo_code_RBAAN
    Promo_code_RBAAN Posts: 783 ✭✭

    @Ciroxa said:

    @PotatoStarch said:
    It feels like it for the most part.
    Also a lot of good shows were filmed in Canada in the past and not as many anymore are.

    Yeah, I can see that. A lot of classic shows were filmed in Canada too, but fewer are now. Do you think it’s mainly budget and location shifts, or has the whole streaming/binge culture really changed what shows get made and remembered?

    I think it's probably due to policy changes. Filming goes wherever is cheaper to film in, so if the tax incentives aren't good enough anymore they will just stay near the studios, or film somewhere cheaper.
    Streaming changed how we consume tv shows, but most of it is still filmed and not for generated with AI yet.

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

    @PotatoStarch said:

    @Ciroxa said:

    @PotatoStarch said:
    It feels like it for the most part.
    Also a lot of good shows were filmed in Canada in the past and not as many anymore are.

    Yeah, I can see that. A lot of classic shows were filmed in Canada too, but fewer are now. Do you think it’s mainly budget and location shifts, or has the whole streaming/binge culture really changed what shows get made and remembered?

    I think it's probably due to policy changes. Filming goes wherever is cheaper to film in, so if the tax incentives aren't good enough anymore they will just stay near the studios, or film somewhere cheaper.
    Streaming changed how we consume tv shows, but most of it is still filmed and not for generated with AI yet.

    That makes sense—tax incentives have always been a huge driver. Streaming definitely changed consumption, but it’s interesting that production hasn’t shifted to AI-generated content much yet. I wonder how long before that starts affecting where and what gets made.

  • Sébastien_C
    Sébastien_C Posts: 1,338 ✭✭

    TV used to collect a huge part of ad revenue, not anymore. I remember the epoch when buying a 30-second ad on TV was synonymous of business success.

    Digital platforms are attracting most revenu now and TV shows are struggling to break even.

    I don’t see any signs of recovery from TV station and believe that TV is slowly dying since 2012.

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

    @Sébastien_C said:
    TV used to collect a huge part of ad revenue, not anymore. I remember the epoch when buying a 30-second ad on TV was synonymous of business success.

    Digital platforms are attracting most revenu now and TV shows are struggling to break even.

    I don’t see any signs of recovery from TV station and believe that TV is slowly dying since 2012.

    Agreed. TV lost its ad monopoly around 2012, digital ate the revenue, and without scale or margins most shows can’t justify themselves anymore. It’s a slow decline, not a comeback story.

  • doobyadeeb
    doobyadeeb Posts: 451 ✭✭

    The networks cancel everything without even giving it a real chance.

  • Drizzt
    Drizzt Posts: 902 ✭✭

    The decline of TV shows is also a decline of Canadian culture (and also Quebec culture). Digital platforms are mainly American platforms…

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

    @doobyadeeb said:
    The networks cancel everything without even giving it a real chance.

    I know, that sucks. But then all they care about is revenue, not their customers.

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

    @Drizzt said:
    The decline of TV shows is also a decline of Canadian culture (and also Quebec culture). Digital platforms are mainly American platforms…

    Well, American market's so much bigger!

  • doobyadeeb
    doobyadeeb Posts: 451 ✭✭

    @Ciroxa said:

    @doobyadeeb said:
    The networks cancel everything without even giving it a real chance.

    I know, that sucks. But then all they care about is revenue, not their customers.

    So true :(

  • Drizzt
    Drizzt Posts: 902 ✭✭

    @Ciroxa said:

    @Drizzt said:
    The decline of TV shows is also a decline of Canadian culture (and also Quebec culture). Digital platforms are mainly American platforms…

    Well, American market's so much bigger!

    You’re right, but does bigger means better?

  • Shadow20002
    Shadow20002 Posts: 52 ✭✭

    Hmm ..movies and TV series no longer has that vibe.

  • doobyadeeb
    doobyadeeb Posts: 451 ✭✭

    @Shadow20002 said:
    Hmm ..movies and TV series no longer has that vibe.

    what kind of vibe?

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

    @doobyadeeb said:

    @Ciroxa said:

    @doobyadeeb said:
    The networks cancel everything without even giving it a real chance.

    I know, that sucks. But then all they care about is revenue, not their customers.

    So true :(

    It's always about money 🤑🤑🤑

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

    @Drizzt said:

    @Ciroxa said:

    @Drizzt said:
    The decline of TV shows is also a decline of Canadian culture (and also Quebec culture). Digital platforms are mainly American platforms…

    Well, American market's so much bigger!

    You’re right, but does bigger means better?

    No, but bigger market could generate more revenue.

  • Captainluc
    Captainluc Posts: 250 ✭✭

    It’s not just nostalgia. Something has genuinely changed.

    First, there really are more shows than before. With streaming, production has exploded: when everything is available all the time, nothing feels truly rare or special. And that sense of rarity plays a big role in what stays in our memory.

    Then there’s binge culture, which changes how we experience stories. Watching a show over several weeks used to create anticipation, discussion, and theories. Now, when episodes are consumed back-to-back, the experience is intense but short-lived: you enjoy it, you finish it… and then you move on. Our brains simply retain less when we consume things too quickly.

    Algorithms also have a direct impact on how shows are written. They prioritize what grabs attention immediately and is easy to finish, not necessarily what is bold, deep, or long-lasting. The result is many shows that are efficient and well-produced, but lack a strong identity that makes them memorable over time.

    There’s also the loss of “event television.” In the past, everyone watched the same shows at the same pace. Today, audiences are fragmented: everyone has their show, which weakens the collective cultural effect that helps a series stick.

    Finally, yes, nostalgia does play a small role: we remember the best shows from the past and forget the many average ones. But that doesn’t cancel out the broader reality. The current system produces more shows, faster, with shorter cultural lifespans.

    In short: it’s not just you. Streaming, algorithms, and binge culture have truly changed how shows are made, consumed—and remembered.

  • patrickng9
    patrickng9 Posts: 52 ✭✭

    internet and streaming is gonna replace TV, but TV screens for PC will still be alive

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

    @Captainluc said:
    It’s not just nostalgia. Something has genuinely changed.

    First, there really are more shows than before. With streaming, production has exploded: when everything is available all the time, nothing feels truly rare or special. And that sense of rarity plays a big role in what stays in our memory.

    Then there’s binge culture, which changes how we experience stories. Watching a show over several weeks used to create anticipation, discussion, and theories. Now, when episodes are consumed back-to-back, the experience is intense but short-lived: you enjoy it, you finish it… and then you move on. Our brains simply retain less when we consume things too quickly.

    Algorithms also have a direct impact on how shows are written. They prioritize what grabs attention immediately and is easy to finish, not necessarily what is bold, deep, or long-lasting. The result is many shows that are efficient and well-produced, but lack a strong identity that makes them memorable over time.

    There’s also the loss of “event television.” In the past, everyone watched the same shows at the same pace. Today, audiences are fragmented: everyone has their show, which weakens the collective cultural effect that helps a series stick.

    Finally, yes, nostalgia does play a small role: we remember the best shows from the past and forget the many average ones. But that doesn’t cancel out the broader reality. The current system produces more shows, faster, with shorter cultural lifespans.

    In short: it’s not just you. Streaming, algorithms, and binge culture have truly changed how shows are made, consumed—and remembered.

    Streaming turned TV into an all-you-can-eat buffet, and nothing feels special when there’s no scarcity. Bingeing wipes out anticipation, algorithms flatten identity, and fragmented audiences kill the “event” moment. Nostalgia plays a part, but the real shift is structural. The system now produces more shows with shorter lifespans, so fewer stick.

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

    @patrickng9 said:
    internet and streaming is gonna replace TV, but TV screens for PC will still be alive

    TV as a broadcast model is fading, but the big screen isn’t going anywhere. The pipe changes, not the panel. People will keep using TV-sized displays—they’ll just be driven by apps, consoles, and PCs instead of cable boxes. The living-room screen survives; the old TV ecosystem doesn’t.

  • patrickng9
    patrickng9 Posts: 52 ✭✭

    @Ciroxa said:

    @patrickng9 said:
    internet and streaming is gonna replace TV, but TV screens for PC will still be alive

    TV as a broadcast model is fading, but the big screen isn’t going anywhere. The pipe changes, not the panel. People will keep using TV-sized displays—they’ll just be driven by apps, consoles, and PCs instead of cable boxes. The living-room screen survives; the old TV ecosystem doesn’t.

    I agree with what you say

  • Ciroxa
    Ciroxa Posts: 2,718 ✭✭

    @patrickng9 said:

    @Ciroxa said:

    @patrickng9 said:
    internet and streaming is gonna replace TV, but TV screens for PC will still be alive

    TV as a broadcast model is fading, but the big screen isn’t going anywhere. The pipe changes, not the panel. People will keep using TV-sized displays—they’ll just be driven by apps, consoles, and PCs instead of cable boxes. The living-room screen survives; the old TV ecosystem doesn’t.

    I agree with what you say

    It’ll be interesting to see how fast the old TV model collapses compared to how fast people shift to app-driven screens.